Michigan Supreme Court ruled that 2019 amendments to the state's No-Fault Act are not retroactive.
Comments
Recent arrest shows Michigan getting serious about limiting fraudulent auto liability claims.
This month's edition of our Michigan Shop Talk focuses on nine No Fault auto liability cases of note.
Michigan Court of Appeals gets set to review constitutionality of auto No-Fault reform legislation.
National campaign reminds drivers that driving distracted could cost you and others on the road.
Michigan Court of Appeals ruling appears to be a game changer for the defense of medical provider claims under state’s No-Fault statute.
What is the amount of wage-loss benefits allowed under the Michigan No-Fault Act?
Michigan Supreme Court rules that, under certain circumstances, No-Fault insurers may not avoid payment of mandatory PIP benefits even if fraud is involved.
Investigating a plaintiff’s prior suits may reveal contrary positions barring a claim through judicial estoppel.
Following major overhaul of state's PIP auto insurance, Michigan Catastrophic Claims Association slashes 2020-2021 assessments.
Effective July 1, Michigan auto insurance rates will increase by $28 per vehicle for state’s catastrophic injury fund.
Appellate Court upholds grant of summary disposition in a PIP no-fault case involving an injury at a gasoline pump.
Michigan motorists face higher gas tax and fees for annual license plate renewals.
Supreme Court ruling clears path for plaintiffs to claim additional bodily injury damages in municipal vehicle liability cases.
Appellate court upholds grant of summary disposition in fraudulent PIP and uninsured motorist case.
Appellate court rules tricking out your ride could change its classification as a motor vehicle.
Appellate court’s ruling blurs applicability of res judicata in Michigan to uninsured motorist claims after prior no-fault suit
What is the Medicare Secondary Payment Act and why is important in the litigation context? This post provides a breakdown of the basics.
Appellate court affirms ruling that no-fault insurance benefits are unavailable to plaintiff who allowed policy to be cancelled on same day as motor vehicle accident.
Topics
- No Fault Liability
- Motor Vehicle Liability
- Transportation
- Trucking Liability
- Appellate Law
- Civil Litigation
- Cargo Liability
- Auto Liability
- Personal Injury Protection (PIP)
- Artificial Intelligence
- Insurance
- Fraud Activity
- Underinsured Motorist Insurance (UIM)
- Negligence
- insurance policy
- Sanctions
- Premises Liability
- Coronavirus
- COVID-19
- Judicial Estoppel
- Retail Liability
- Driver Exclusion
- Bankruptcy
- Risk Management
- Governmental Immunity
- Medicare Issues
Recent Updates
- What Canty v Mason Means for Michigan Auto Accident Defendants and Insurers
- Appellate Court Rules ‘Novel’ Pain Treatment Fails to Meet Reasonableness, Necessity Requirements for Payment of Michigan No-Fault Benefits
- How Truck Driver Monitoring with AI Technology is Reshaping Accident Litigation
- Ruling Clarifies Application of Michigan No-Fault Act’s Fee Schedule for Motorcycle Accident Claims Regardless of When Policy was Issued
- Michigan Supreme Court Denies Plaintiff’s Push to Retroactively Apply Amended No-Fault Act
- Michigan Appeals Court Affirms Key Limits on Underinsured Motorist Coverage
- U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit Limits Scope of Preemption Governing Freight Broker’s Selection of Motor Carrier
- Fee Schedule Applies to Third-Party Claims for Excess Allowable Expenses
- Appellate Court Rules Insured Entitled to Unlimited Attendant Care Benefits
- Case Update: Appellate Court Updates Recent Decision to Published Status, Expanding Definition of ‘Unlawful’ Under Michigan PIP Law
