The U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) recently released a proposed regulation that would raise the minimum salary threshold for exemption from overtime pay for certain exempt employees who work in administrative, professional and executive jobs, the so-called “white-collar exemptions.”
Under the Fair Labor Standards Act, almost all hourly workers in the United States are entitled to overtime pay, at least time-and-a-half their regular rate, for any hours worked over 40 in a workweek. However, employees who satisfy the “white-collar exemptions” are exempt from the overtime requirement unless they earn below a certain level.
Under current regulations, employees in these categories are not eligible for overtime if they earn more than $35,568 per year, or not less than $684 per week. The proposed rule would raise that threshold to $55,068 per year, or not less than $1,059 per week. Additionally, the rule would adopt an automatic increase to the salary threshold every three years.
According to DOL officials, the proposed new rule would expand overtime eligibility to 27% of salaried workers because their salary would fall under the new threshold. The proposed rule would largely impact sectors where managerial employees fall under the new threshold, including hospitality, retail, food and manufacturing. The DOL estimates that raising the salary threshold would result in overtime eligibility for an additional 3.6 million employees, including 300,000 manufacturing workers, 300,000 retail workers, 180,000 hospitality workers and 600,000 healthcare and social services workers.
Proponents of the proposed rule argue that the salary threshold has remained too low for too long, with the last two increases in 2004 and 2019. Meanwhile, critics highlight that setting the threshold too high will negatively impact smaller businesses that already face staffing challenges. Others argue the timing could be disruptive as the economy is still recovering from the impacts of COVID-19, such as diminished labor participation and recovering supply chains.
The proposed rule is currently open for public comment until Oct. 29. DOL officials will consider all comments received before publishing a final rule. In the interim, employers should evaluate the impact this proposed rule would have on their businesses and plan accordingly.
Attorneys in Plunkett Cooney’s Labor & Employment Practice Group are available to counsel employers and assist in implementation of necessary changes if this proposed rule is adopted.
Add a comment
Topics
- Employment Liability
- Labor Law
- Department of Labor (DOL)
- Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA)
- Employment Discrimination
- Employment Agreement
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC)
- Human Resources
- Wage & Hour
- Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA)
- National Labor Relations Act
- At Will Employment
- Minimum Wage
- Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR)
- COVID-19
- National Labor Relations Board
- Coronavirus
- Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA)
- Noncompete Agreements
- No Tax on Overtime
- Overtime
- Payroll
- National Labor Relations Board (NLRB)
- Arbitration
- Whistleblower Protection Act
- Civil Rights
- Regulatory Law
- Contract Employees
- Title VII
- Paid Medical Leave Act (PMLA)
- Sick Leave
- Tax Law
- Workplace Harassment
- Earned Sick Time
- Retaliation
- Transgender Issues
- OSHA Issues
- Contracts
- Unemployment Benefits
- Federal Trade Commission
- Business Risk Management
- Hostile Work Environment
- Civil Litigation
- Settlements
- ERISA
- Workers' Compensation
- Accommodations
- Cannabis
- Public Education
- LGBTQ
- Class Actions
- Department of Justice
- Medicare Issues
- Sexual Harassment
- Garnishments
- Social Media
- Retail Liability
- RICO
- Emergency Information
- Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act (USERRA)
- Department of Education (DOE)
- Title IX
- Medical Marijuana
- Right to Work
- Union Organizing & Relations
Recent Updates
- Department of Labor Proposes Rule Altering Joint Employer Analysis
- Federal Policy Favors Arbitration but Poor Drafting Derails Enforcement
- An Employers Guide to New OBBBA Overtime Reporting Requirements
- Federal Court Rules State Discrimination Claims Subject to Mandatory Arbitration
- Are Boilerplate Terms in Employment Applications Enforceable?
- Is Your Business Ready for Pay Transparency Laws?
- Supreme Court Resolves Circuit Split in Reverse Discrimination Cases
- Michigan Legislature Avoids Chaos by Amending Earned Sick Time Act Just Prior to Deadline
- Implementing the Pregnant Workers Fairness Act: Key Insights for Employers
- Federal Court Throws out DOL’s Attempt to Rewrite White Collar Overtime Rules




