The Michigan Supreme Court’s July 31 opinion in Mothering Justice v. Attorney General sparked a host of questions about existing sick leave policies, the minimum wage, and the future of the “tipped employee credit,” among others.
On Sept 18, the state’s high court clarified aspects of its opinion regarding the minimum wage.
First, the Supreme Court clarified the schedule for increasing the minimum wage and phasing out the credit for tipped workers. Beginning Feb. 21, the minimum hourly wage will be $10.00 plus the state treasurer’s inflation adjustment, with July 31, 2024 serving as the endpoint for that calculation. Meanwhile the tipped workers’ minimum wage will increase to 48% of the general minimum wage. By Feb. 21, 2030, the phase-in schedule contemplated by the Wage Act will be complete, and tipped employees must be paid 100% of the general minimum wage by that time.
Second, in response to questions by the Michigan Attorney General and Gov. Gretchen Whitmer’s administration, the Supreme Court clarified that adjustments to the minimum wage and applicable percentages for tipped workers will occur on February 21st of each year—not January 1st—beginning in 2025 and concluding in 2030.
Finally, concerning the inflation adjustments necessary for determining the minimum wage set to take effect on Feb. 21, 2025, the court confirmed that the inflationary period to consider is Jan. 1, 2019 through July 31, 2024. The high court reiterated that the state treasurer has until Nov. 1, 2024 to complete that assessment.
Meanwhile, with February 2025 on the horizon, lawmakers have introduced a bill (Senate Bill No. 991) that, if enacted, would considerably scale back the wage increases set to take effect while maintaining the tipped worker credit. On Sept. 11, 2024, that bill was referred to the Senate Committee on Labor, where attorneys from Plunkett Cooney will continue to monitor its progress.
- Senior Attorney
The Leader of Plunkett Cooney's Labor & Employment Law Practice Group, Erik G. Bradberry exclusively defends the interests of employers in litigation and advises them on labor relations and workplace-related regulatory ...
Add a comment
Topics
- Employment Liability
- Labor Law
- Department of Labor (DOL)
- Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA)
- Employment Discrimination
- Employment Agreement
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC)
- Human Resources
- Wage & Hour
- Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA)
- National Labor Relations Act
- At Will Employment
- Minimum Wage
- Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR)
- COVID-19
- National Labor Relations Board
- Coronavirus
- Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA)
- Noncompete Agreements
- No Tax on Overtime
- Overtime
- Payroll
- National Labor Relations Board (NLRB)
- Arbitration
- Whistleblower Protection Act
- Civil Rights
- Regulatory Law
- Contract Employees
- Title VII
- Paid Medical Leave Act (PMLA)
- Sick Leave
- Tax Law
- Workplace Harassment
- Earned Sick Time
- Retaliation
- Transgender Issues
- OSHA Issues
- Contracts
- Unemployment Benefits
- Federal Trade Commission
- Business Risk Management
- Hostile Work Environment
- Civil Litigation
- Settlements
- ERISA
- Workers' Compensation
- Accommodations
- Cannabis
- Public Education
- LGBTQ
- Class Actions
- Department of Justice
- Medicare Issues
- Sexual Harassment
- Garnishments
- Social Media
- Retail Liability
- RICO
- Emergency Information
- Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act (USERRA)
- Department of Education (DOE)
- Title IX
- Medical Marijuana
- Right to Work
- Union Organizing & Relations
Recent Updates
- Department of Labor Proposes Rule Altering Joint Employer Analysis
- Federal Policy Favors Arbitration but Poor Drafting Derails Enforcement
- An Employers Guide to New OBBBA Overtime Reporting Requirements
- Federal Court Rules State Discrimination Claims Subject to Mandatory Arbitration
- Are Boilerplate Terms in Employment Applications Enforceable?
- Is Your Business Ready for Pay Transparency Laws?
- Supreme Court Resolves Circuit Split in Reverse Discrimination Cases
- Michigan Legislature Avoids Chaos by Amending Earned Sick Time Act Just Prior to Deadline
- Implementing the Pregnant Workers Fairness Act: Key Insights for Employers
- Federal Court Throws out DOL’s Attempt to Rewrite White Collar Overtime Rules





