DOL Finalizes Rule Tightening Independent Contractor Test

On Jan. 9, the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) issued its final rule, “Employee or Independent Contractor Classification under the Fair Labor Standards Act.”  29 CR 780, 788, 795.  

The rule takes effect on March 11 and replaces the 2021 Independent Contractor Rule which the DOL believed ignored case law and the DOL’s position on independent contractor status. The new rule does not have any effect on other state or federal laws that have different standards for classifying independent contractors. It only applies to the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA).

Under the new rule, an individual is not an independent contractor if they are, as a matter of economic reality, economically dependent on an employer for work. The final rule applies six factors to analyze employee or independent contractor status under the FLSA:

(1)  opportunity for profit or loss depending on managerial skill;

(2)  investments by the worker and the potential employer;

(3)  degree of permanence of the work relationship;

(4)  nature and degree of control;

(5)  extent to which the work performed is an integral part of the potential employer’s business; and

(6)   skill and initiative.

No factor or set of factors among these six has a predetermined weight, and additional factors may be relevant if such factors in some way indicate whether the worker is in business for themselves, and therefore an independent contractor, as opposed to being economically dependent on the employer for work, thus an employee under the FLSA.

The final rule is 330 pages and contains detailed guidance regarding how to apply the factors. Employers need to act now to determine whether any individuals you currently have classified as an independent contractor will still be properly classified under the new rule.

It is highly likely that many individuals currently classified as independent contractors, will be classified as employees under the new rule, which is the point of the rule change.

This requires a complicated analysis, so seeking the advice of counsel may prove valuable to ensure your business is complaint with the final rule.

Share: Twitter Facebook LinkedIn Email

Add a comment

Type the following characters: romeo, papa, whisky, three, whisky

* Indicates a required field.

Employment Law Guide

Topics

Recent Updates

Plunkett Cooney Blogs

Plunkett Cooney Cookie Preference Center

Your Privacy

When you visit our website, we use cookies on your browser to collect information. The information collected might relate to you, your preferences, or your device, and is mostly used to make the site work as you expect it to and to provide a more personalized web experience. For more information about how we use Cookies, please see our Privacy Policy.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

Always Active

Necessary cookies enable core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility. These cookies may only be disabled by changing your browser settings, but this may affect how the website functions.

Functional Cookies

Always Active

Some functions of the site require remembering user choices, for example your cookie preference, or keyword search highlighting. These do not store any personal information.

Form Submissions

Always Active

When submitting your data, for example on a contact form or event registration, a cookie might be used to monitor the state of your submission across pages.

Performance Cookies

Performance cookies help us improve our website by collecting and reporting information on its usage. We access and process information from these cookies at an aggregate level.

Powered by Firmseek