Publications

PDF

Supreme Court Limits Recovery of Actual Attorney Fees, Court Costs In Open Meetings Act Cases

Hilary A. Ballentine
Municipal Matters Newsletter - Spring/Summer 2015 Edition
06.24.2015

Perhaps one of the major incentives for plaintiffs to pursue claims brought under the Open Meetings Act (OMA) is the possibility of recovering attorney’s fees and costs if they are successful in the action.

A provision of the OMA allows for recovery of court costs and actual attorney’s fees, if a person brings a civil suit “for injunctive relief to compel compliance or to enjoin further noncompliance” and “succeeds in obtaining relief in the action.”

The latter part of this statutory provision has caused much confusion in the courts, and it has produced a series of cases that allow plaintiffs to recover their attorney’s fees even for minor, technical violations of the Act that do not result in the issuance of an injunction.

In its Speicher v Columbia Township Board of Trustees opinion, the Michigan Supreme Court abrogated that line of cases, holding that a plaintiff must seek and actually obtain injunction relief in order to recover attorney’s fees and costs. The Supreme Court based its decision not only on the precise wording of the statute itself, but also on the statutory scheme as a whole.

As a result of the Supreme Court’s ruling, municipalities are sure to see plaintiffs pushing more forcefully for injunctive relief in OMA cases than ever before. However, given the general difficulty in demonstrating that the extraordinary remedy of injunctive relief is appropriate, the Supreme Court’s decision in Speicher should result in fewer attorney fee awards to plaintiffs.

The Municipal Matters Newsletter is distributed by the firm of Plunkett Cooney. Any questions or comments concerning the matters reported may be addressed to Audrey J. Forbush or any other members of the practice group. The brevity of this newsletter prevents comprehensive treatment of all legal issues, and the information contained herein should not be taken as legal advice. Advice for specific matters should be sought directly from legal counsel. Copyright© 2015. All rights reserved PLUNKETT COONEY, P.C.

Practice Areas

Plunkett Cooney Cookie Preference Center

Your Privacy

When you visit our website, we use cookies on your browser to collect information. The information collected might relate to you, your preferences, or your device, and is mostly used to make the site work as you expect it to and to provide a more personalized web experience. For more information about how we use Cookies, please see our Privacy Policy.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

Always Active

Necessary cookies enable core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility. These cookies may only be disabled by changing your browser settings, but this may affect how the website functions.

Functional Cookies

Always Active

Some functions of the site require remembering user choices, for example your cookie preference, or keyword search highlighting. These do not store any personal information.

Form Submissions

Always Active

When submitting your data, for example on a contact form or event registration, a cookie might be used to monitor the state of your submission across pages.

Performance Cookies

Performance cookies help us improve our website by collecting and reporting information on its usage. We access and process information from these cookies at an aggregate level.

Powered by Firmseek